Narrative Tolerance: Overcoming the Maze of National Historical Narratives

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31812/apd.v0i20.2780

Keywords:

Narrative Tolerance, National Historical Narrative

Abstract

This paper aims to justify the thesis that the lack of a unifying «national project» in Ukrainian history writing (a national historical narrative) should be considered rather as an advantage of our country. Now we have a real chance to construct a historical narrative of cultural convergence. The colonial past, when Ukrainian territories were parts of several cultural regions, gave us not only negative experience but also positive experience of cultural interaction (convergence). Nowadays multinationality, multiculturalism and religious polyconfessionality constitute a significant advantage of an independent Ukrainian state because it coincides with the main global tendency to build the common multicultural global world based on the idea of human rights.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Abstract views: 300 / PDF downloads: 166

References

Anderson B. Uyavleni spilnoti. Mirkuvannya schodo pohodzhennya j poshirennya nacionalizmu. – Kyiv : Kritika, 2001.

Arendt H. Istoki totalitarizma. – Moskva : CentrKom, 1996.

Danto A. Analiticheskaya filosofiya istorii. – Moskva : Ideya-Press, 2002.

Gellner E. Nacii i nacionalizm. – Moskva : Progress, 1991.

Gidens E. Nestrimnij svit: yak globalizaciya peretvoryuye nashe zhittya. – Kyiv : Altapres, 2004.

Gnatyuk O. Vid istoriyi ideyi do novoyi shemi istoriyi CentralnoShidnoyi Yevropi // Shporlyuk R. Formuvannya modernih nacij: Ukrayina – Rosiya – Polsha. – Kyiv : DUH I LITERA, 2016.

Danto A. Analiticheskaya filosofiya istorii. – Moskva : Ideya-Press, 2002.

Kasyanov G. Past continuous: istorichna politika 1980-h – 2000-h. Ukrayina ta susidi. – Kyiv : Laurus, Antropos-Logos-Film, 2018.

Kappeler A. Mala istoriya Ukrayini. – Kyiv : K.I.S., 2007.

Kappeler A. Ukrayina mizh Shodom i Zahodom // Shid-Zahid: istoriko-kulturologichnij zbirnik. – Harkiv: Majdan, 1999. – Vyp. 2.

Megill A. Istoriya s pamyatyu, istoriya bez pamyati // Megill A. Istoricheskaya epistemologiya. – Moskva : Kanon+ ROOI Reabilitaciya, 2007.

Megill A. Narrativ i chetyre zadachi istoriopisaniya // Megill A. Istoricheskaya epistemologiya. – Moskva : Kanon+ ROOI Reabilitaciya, 2007. – S. 240-241.

Megill A. Obladaet li narrativ sobstvennoj poznavatelnoj cennostyu? // Megill A. Istoricheskaya epistemologiya. – Moskva : Kanon+ ROOI Reabilitaciya, 2007.

Nora P. Teperishnye, naciya, pam’yat. – Kyiv : TOV Vidavnictvo KLIO, 2014.

Popper K. Vidkrite suspilstvo ta jogo vorogi. Tom 2: Spalah proroctva: Gegel, Marks ta poslidovniki. – Kyiv : Osnovi, 1994.

Smit E.D. Kulturni osnovi nacij. Iyerarhiya, zapovit i respublika. – Kyiv : Tempora, 2009.

Smit E.D. Nacionalna identichnist. – Kyiv : Osnovi, 1994.

Stelmah S. Obraz istoriyi Ukrayini Andreasa Kappelera // Kappeler A. Mala istoriya Ukrayini. – Kyiv : K.I.S., 2007.

White H. Metaistoriya: Istoricheskoe voobrazhenie v Evrope XIX veka. – Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Uralskogo universiteta, 2002.

Hobsbaum E. Nacii i nacionalizm posle 1780 goda. – SPb.: ALETEJYa, 1998.

Shporlyuk R. Polsha: teoriya ta praktika modernoyi naciyi (1770-1870) // Shporlyuk R. Formuvannya modernih nacij: Ukrayina – Rosiya – Polsha. – Kyiv : DUH I LITERA, 2016.

Shporlyuk R. Ukrayina: vid imperskoyi okrayini do nezalezhnoyi derzhavi // Shporlyuk R. Formuvannya modernih nacij: Ukrayina – Rosiya – Polsha. – Kyiv : DUH I LITERA, 2016.

Shporlyuk R. Formuvannya modernoyi Ukrayini: zahidnij vymir // Shporlyuk R. Formuvannya modernih nacij: Ukrayina – Rosiya – Polsha. – Kyiv : DUH I LITERA, 2016.

Anderson B. Imagined Communities. Reflection on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. – London; New York: VERSO, 2006.

Arendt H. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New edition with added prefaces. – San Diego; New York; London: A Harvest Book: Harcourt Brace & Company, 1985.

Goldstein L. Historical Knowing. – Austin & London: University of Texas Press, 1976.

Kappeler A. Ukraine and Russia: Legacies of the imperial past and competing memories // Journal of Eurasian Studies. – 2004. – No 5.

Kuukkanen J.-M. Postnarrativist Philosophy of Historiography. – Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.

Popper K.R. The Open Society and its Enemies. Volume II: The High Tide of Prophecy: Hegel, Marx, and the Aftermath. – London: George Routledge & Sons, Ltd., 1945.

Roth P.A. Hayden White and the Aesthetics of Historiography // History of the Human Sciences. – 1992. – Vol. 5. – No 1.

Roth P.A. The Pasts // History and Theory. – 2012. – No 51 (October).

White H. The Burden of History // History and Theory. – 1966. – Vol. 5. — No 2.

White H. The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality // White H. The Content of the Form. Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. – Baltimore and London : Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987.

White H. The Question of Narrative in Contemporary Historical Theory // White H. The Content of the Form. Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. – Baltimore and London : Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987.

Published

2019-11-30

How to Cite

Mishalova, O. (2019). Narrative Tolerance: Overcoming the Maze of National Historical Narratives. Actual Problems of Mind, (20), 46–71. https://doi.org/10.31812/apd.v0i20.2780

Issue

Section

Empty

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>