Implementation of reflective model of educational practice in the modern finnish school

Main Article Content

Kyrylo Ye. Stupak

Abstract

The article considers the example of a country whose educational system has absorbed the ideas of philosophical concepts of critical thinking of I. Kant and M. Lipman. After all, thanks to the dynamic integration processes in the world, we pay attention to reflective models of education, which lead us to the question: What is more relevant today - memorization of information or its critical analysis?


The article attempts to investigate the organization of education in Finnish schools through the prism of I. Kant's reflexive model and M. Lipman's reflexive model of educational practice.


Kant in his work "Critique of Pure Reason" used the concept of reflection in order to explain the specifics of the work of consciousness. He divided the concept of reflection into transcendental and logical. Logical reflection only compares concepts with each other and cannot judge things a priori. Transcendental reflection - the basis for the possibility of objective comparison of ideas with each other.


Based on the provisions of Kant's work on reflection as a way of forming new concepts and judgments through the comparison of existing ideas, M. Lipman proposed a reflective model of education, which is devoted to his work "Reflective model of educational practice.


The article also analyzes the role of phenomenon-based teaching and learning in the education of critical thinking, which is necessary for the successful life of the individual in the modern information society. The Finnish school shows us that the study of phenomena helps the student not only to understand what is happening, but pushes him to formulate an independent opinion on any issue in life. This creates an approach called "reflective model of education", which was fully discussed by I. Kant in the field of philosophy, and M. Lipman in the field of psychology and pedagogy.


The article attempts to argue that the construction of the learning process in the Finnish school has the features of a reflexive paradigm of critical practice, which is its integral feature.


The experience of organizing education in a Finnish school can be used in the development of a new Ukrainian school.

Article Details

How to Cite
Stupak, K. (2020). Implementation of reflective model of educational practice in the modern finnish school. Educational Dimension, 55, 46-59. https://doi.org/10.31812/educdim.v55i0.4378
Section
History of Education, Learning and Training
Author Biography

Kyrylo Ye. Stupak, Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University

Graduate student of the Department of Pedagogy of Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University

References

1. Adamenko, N.: “Spilnota doslidnykiv” M. Lipmana: filosofski zapytuvannia, obhovorennia, arhumentatsii ta kontrarhumentatsii vustamy ditei (M. Lipman’s “Community of Researchers”: Philosophical Questions, Discussions, Arguments and Counter-Arguments through Children’s Mouths). Filosofiia osvity 1–2, 275–287 (2011)
2. Hryniuk, S. P.: Sumlinna pratsia: yak finy pobuduvaly uspishnu systemu osvity (Hard work: how the Finns built a successful education system). Visnyk pisliadyplomnoi osvity 5, 57–64 (2011)
3. Zhadiaev, D.V.: O poniatii refleksii u I.Kanta (On the concept of reflection in I.Kant). https://www.academia.edu/7866313/%D0%9E_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%8F%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%84%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D1%83_%D0%98_%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B0_On_Concept_of_Reflection_in_Kant_Rus_(2009). Accessed 29 Nov 2020
4. Zagvozdkin, V.: Sekret finskogo uspekha (The secret of Finnish success). Narodnoe obrazovanie 14, 57–66 (2006)
5. Kant, I.: Kritika chistogo razuma (Criticism of Pure Reason). Eksmo,Moscow (2006)
6. Kuzmin, A.A.: Tipologiia transtcendentalnoi refleksii v filosofii I.Kanta (Typology of transcendental reflection in the philosophy of I.Kant). In: Briushinkin, V.N. (ed) Kant zwischenWest und Ost, Vol. 1, pp. 228–234. Izd-vo RGU im. I.Kanta, Kaliningrad (2005)
7. Lipman, M.: The reflective model of educational practice. In: Thinking in Education. http://window.edu.ru/resource/200/42200/files/pril1_1.pdf (1991)
8. Lipman, M.: Krytychne myslennia: chym vono mozhe buty? (Critical thinking: what can it be?). Postmetodyka 2 (60), 33–41 (2005)
9. Ozhegov, S. I.: Slovar russkogo iazyka: 7000 slov (Russian dictionary: 7000 words). Russkii iazyk, Moscow (1989)
10. Pysarevskyi, M.: Osvita u Finliandii: shkoly bez stin, navchannia bez otsinok (Education in Finland: schools without walls, studies without grades). http://civilrightssociety.blogspot.com/2018/02/blog-post_2.html (2017). Accessed 25 Oct 2020
11. Rodiuk, N. Iu., Lazarenko, N. I., Ched, D.: Innovatsiini protsesy v rozvytku vyshchoi osvity Finliandii (Innovative processes in the development of higher education in Finland). Molodyi vchenyi 5.2 (57.2), 38–41 (2018)
12. Savchenko, O.Ya.: Dydaktyka pochatkovoi shkoly (Didactics of primary school). Heneza, Kyiv (1999)
13. Slovar inostrannykh slov (Dictionary of foreign words). Russkii iazyk, Moscow (1988)
14. Filosofskii entciklopedicheskii slovar (Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary). Inostrannaia literatura, Moscow (2003)
15. Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R. (eds.): A Taxonomy for Learning, Teachuing, and Assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Lonfman, New York (2001)

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.