Оverview of modern models of training system future teachers

Authors

  • Alla Kharkivska Municipal Institution “Kharkiv Humanitarian and Pedagogical Academy”
  • Olena Kapustina Municipal Institution “Kharkiv Humanitarian and Pedagogical Academy”

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31812/educdim.4516

Keywords:

model, modeling, pedagogical modeling, model of education system, professional training, future teachers

Abstract

The current state of higher education is characterized by significant reforms. The state needs highly qualified specialists with professional competencies and a well-established system of moral attitudes and beliefs. That is why the issue of training, which includes the education of the personality of students in higher education, is relevant at this stage of development of education in Ukraine. The article highlights the goals of professional training, urgent tasks that arise in modern education. The need to build a model of the education system as an effective means of achieving goals and solving problems is emphasized. The article considers approaches to the definition of “model”, “modeling”. The classification of models is presented. Yes, scientists distinguish between physical, mathematical, computer, descriptive models. They are also divided into educational and research. The latter can be ascertaining, research, imitation. It is determined that the humanities prefer descriptive and mathematical models. Important requirements for the models include adequate reflection of characteristics and reliability. Pedagogical modeling is considered as a method of pedagogical research, which allows to increase the efficiency of the educational process, as well as aims at educators to implement the tasks of personality-oriented learning. The stages of modeling of the educational system (cognitive-analytical and constructive) and its activity during each of them are analyzed, in particular definition of the purpose, tasks, substantiation of pedagogical conditions, realization of psychological and pedagogical diagnostics, forecasting of results of activity, definition of forms, methods, methods of work, educational tools. The article reviews the models of the training system proposed by domestic scientists. It is determined that the main components of the model are: purpose, stages, pedagogical conditions, functions, forms, methods of work and result. It was found that the effectiveness of the implementation of the model is possible provided the unity and indivisibility of all its components. We consider the implementation of a comparative analysis of the training system models of Ukraine and Western countries to be a prospect for further research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Аistrakhanov, D. D.: Stan doslidzhen zmistu profesiinoi pidhotovky maibutnikh fakhivtsiv. Visnyk Zhytomyrskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Franka. Seriia “Pedahohichni nauky” 3 (81), 29–34 (2015)

Bykov, V. Yu.: Teoretyko-metodolohichni zasady modeliuvannia navchalnoho seredovyshcha suchasnykh pedahohichnykh system. Informatsiini tekhnolohii i zasoby navchannia, 5–15 (2005)

Honcherenko, S.: Fundamentalizatsiia profesiinoi osvity. Ksztalcenie zawodowe: pedagogika i psychologia 7, 165–175 (2006)

Dubaseniuk, O. A., Semeniuk, T. V., Antonova, O. Ie.: Profesiina pidhotovka maibutnoho vchytelia do pedahohichnoi diialnosti: monohrafiia. Zhytomyr. derzh. ped. un-t (2003)

Yezhova, O. V.: Klasyfikatsiia modelei v pedahohichnykh doslidzhenniakh Naukovi zapysky. Seriia: Problemy metodyky fizyko-matematychnoi i tekhnolohichnoi osvity 2 (5), 202–206. https://phm.cuspu.edu.ua/ojs/index.php/NZ-PMFMTO/article/view/507/484 (2014). Accessed 28 Oct 2021

Kobernyk, O. M.: Teoretyko-metodychni zasady modeliuvannia vykhovnoi systemy shkoly. Pedahohichnyi almanakh 25, 16–23 (2015). http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/pedalm_2015_25_4

Kozlovskyi, Yu. M.: Modeliuvannia naukovoi diialnosti vyshchoho navchalnoho zakladu na osnovi synerhetychnoho pidkhodu. Pedahohika i psykholohiia profesiinoi osvity 3, 51–59. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Pippo_2013_3_6 (2013). Accessed 28 Oct 2021

Maievskyi, M. I.: Eksperymentalna model formuvannia tsinnisnykh oriientatsii na fizychnu kulturu studentok pedahohichnykh spetsialnostei. Visnyk Chernihivskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu. Seriia: Pedahohichni nauky. Fizychne vykhovannia ta sport 129 (3), 210–213 http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/VchdpuPN_2015_129%283%29__51 (2015). Accessed 28 Oct 2021

Molchaniuk, O. V.: Teoretyko-metodolohichni zasady vykhovanniav maibutnikh uchyteliv biolohii tsinnisnoho stavlennia do pryrody. Kyiv (2020)

Nychkalo, N. H.: Rozvytok profesiinoi osvity v umovakh hlobalizatsiinykh ta intehratsiinykh protsesiv: monohrafiia. Vydavnytstvo NPU imeni M. P. Drahomanova, Kyiv (2014)

Novikova, T. L.: Do problemy formuvannia sotsiokulturnykh tsinnostei maibutnikh ofitseriv-prykordonnykiv u protsesi vyvchennia humanitarnykh dystsyplin. Zb. Nauk. prats Khmelnytskoho instytutu sotsialnykh tekhnolohii Universytetu “Ukraina” 4, 123–126. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Znpkhist_2011_4_28 (2011). Accessed 28 Oct 2021

Ponomarov, O. S. Sereda, N. V., Chebotarov, M. K.: Modeliuvannia diialnosti fakhivtsia: navch.-metod. posibnyk. NTU “KhPI”, Kharkiv (2015)

Ponomarova, H. F.: Systema vykhovnoi roboty u vyshchykh pedahohichnykh navchalnykh zakladakh. Skhidnoukr. Sievierodonetsk (2016)

Prytuliak, L. M.: Pedahohichna vzaiemodiia yak osnova yakisnoi pidhotovky maibutnikh vykhovateliv zakladiv doshkilnoi osvity Problemy inzhenerno-pedahohichnoi osvity 65, 156–165 (2019)

Pro vyshchu osvitu : Zakon Ukrainy vid 01.06.2014 No 1556-VII. VVR. St. 1. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1556-18 (2014). Accessed 28 Oct 2021

Radkevych, V.: Profesiina osvita i navchannia: yevropeiskyi kontekst rozvytku. Naukovyi visnyk Instytutu profesiino-tekhnichnoi osvity NAPN Ukrainy. Profesiina pedahohika 14, 5–14 (2017)

Teplytska, A. O.: Model i modeliuvannia v profesiinii osviti maibutnikh uchyteliv Dukhovnist osobystosti: metodolohiia, teoriia i praktyka 6, 181–191. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/domtp_2015_6_22 (2015). Accessed 28 Oct 2021

Chernyshova, Ye. R., Huzii, N. V., Liakhotskyi, V. P. (eds.): Terminolohichnyi slovnyk z osnov pidhotovky naukovykh ta naukovo-pedahohichnykh kadriv pisliadyplomnoi pedahohichnoi osvity. Derzh. vyshch. navch. zaklad “Un-t menedzh. osvity”, Kyiv (2014)

Turchyn, A. I.: Osoblyvosti praktychnoi profesiino-pedahohichnoi pidhotovky maibutnikh uchyteliv profesiinoi shkoly v Nimechchyni. Naukovi zapysky Ternopilskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni Volodymyra Hnatiuka. Seriia: Pedahohika 3, 141–150 (2010)

Kharkivska, A. A.: Modeliuvannia upravlinnia innovatsiinym rozvytkom pedahohichnoho VNZ. Teoriia ta metodyka upravlinnia osvitoiu 10. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ttmuo_2013_10_47 (2013). Accessed 28 Oct 2021

Shapran, Yu. P.: Pedahohichne modeliuvannia u protsesi formuvannia profesiinoi kompetentnosti maibutnoho vchytelia biolohii. Ridna shkola 12, 39–43. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/rsh_2012_12_9 (2012). Accessed 28 Oct 2021

Shevchenko, L. S.: Pidhotovka maibutnikh uchyteliv tekhnolohii do innovatsiinoi pedahohichnoi diialnosti: monohrafiia. Vinnytsia (2018)

Published

09-12-2021

How to Cite

Kharkivska, A., & Kapustina, O. . (2021). Оverview of modern models of training system future teachers. Educational Dimension, 57(5), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.31812/educdim.4516

Issue

Section

Theories of Learning, Education and Training