An evolution of debate between continental and analytic philosophers

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31812/apd.v0i17.1877

Keywords:

Continental philosophy, analytical philosophy, methodology, metaphysics, science

Abstract

Historical change in the specificity of the debate between continental and analytic philosophers is studied via comparison of the ideas of E. Husserl and G. Frege, M. Heidegger and R. Carnap, J. Derrida and J. Searle, M. Foucault, and also S. Žižek  and N. Chomsky.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Andriy Synytsya, Lviv State University of Physical Culture
    Candidate of Philosophy (PhD), Department of Humanitarian Disciplines

Downloads

Published

14.02.2017

Issue

No. 17 (2016)

Section

HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY AND PHILOSOPHY OF HISTORY

License

Copyright (c) 2016 Andriy Synytsya

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

An evolution of debate between continental and analytic philosophers. (2017). Actual Problems of Mind, 17, 36-48. https://doi.org/10.31812/apd.v0i17.1877