Specificity of mystical discourse in humanities

Authors

  • Yulia Kravchenko Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University

Keywords:

mystic, mysticism, German mysticism, folklore images, demonological images

Abstract

The article “The specifics of the mystical discourse in humanitarianism” presents the results of research into the essence of mysticism throughout its historical development in the context of philosophy, religious studies, and literature. The author understood the essence of the mystical in such fields of humanities as: philosophy and literary studies. Differences in the perception of mysticism in “Western” and “Eastern” philosophies are clarified. Attention is focused on the concepts of Ukrainian scientists who interpreted mysticism and mysticism in different ways. The concepts of "female mysticism", "Christian mysticism", "German mysticism", mysticism of the occult era, as well as modern mysticism are also analyzed. Their leading specific features, which developed and transformed depending on socio-cultural changes, are singled out. Concepts of mysticism of such philosophers as Meister Eckhart, V. Stace, V. James are outlined.

An attempt was made to analyze mystical elements in myths and folklore, the connection of mysticism with mythopoetics and neomythologism in literature was considered. It has been established that interest in the mystical, as well as in the philosophy of existentialism, especially spreads in response to significant social changes, when values are reassessed and spiritual orientations change, it is the mystical experience that arouses special interest and acquires a mass character.

It has been noticed that mysticism in literature, in particular, in Ukrainian, is now gaining considerable popularity. Authors of whimsical prose, mystical novels and short stories actively engage mystical experience as an anthropological mode. The origins of mystical images in literature can be seen in myths and in German literature of the 18th and 19th centuries (J. von Goethe, E. Hoffmann). The author of the article also drew attention to different classifications of demonological images in Ukrainian literature (classifications by V. Davydyuk, N. Levkovych, A.-D. Kryvenko), their specificity depending on different regions of Ukraine, the connection with holidays and special days for Ukrainians, as well as the fact that many images of Ukrainian mythology are characterized by ambiguity.

Abstract views: 12 / PDF downloads: 7

References

Babii M. Okultyzm i novitnia mistyka v Ukraini. Faktory poshyrennia okultyzmu. Ukrainske relihiieznavstvo. 2008. № 46. S. 382-402.

Biletskyi I. Mistyka i polityka v antychnii ta kytaiskii filosofskykh paradyhmakh. Visnyk Kharkivskoho Natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V.N. Karazina. 2020. № 61. S. 53-60.

Boriak O., Kosmina T., Ponomarov A. Ukraintsi: narodni viruvannia, poviria, demonolohiia. Kyiv : Lybid, 1992. 637 s.

Buiskykh Yu. Problema klasyfikatsii personazhiv nyzhchoi mifolohii v ukrainskii ta zarubizhnii istoriohrafii. Etnichna istoriia narodiv Yevropy. 2007. № 22. S. 144-152.

Veshchykova O. Katehoriia mistychnoho: naukovyi dyskurs i reprezentatsiia v suchasnii prozi perspektyvy. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V.N. Karazina. 2017. № 76. S. 129-133.

Horbonos O., Kariukhina A. Mistychnyi svit yak skladova prostoru khudozhnoi literatury: istoryko-kulturnyi aspekt. Visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho universytetu imeni Alfreda Nobelia. 2015. № 1 (9). S. 6-10.

Hrybkov T. Nimetska mistyka i Hryhorii Skovoroda u yevropeiskii irratsionalistychnii tradytsii : avtoref. dys... kand. filos. nauk : 09.00.05 Lviv, 2006. 18 s.

Hryshchenko I., Naumovska O. Suchasna demonolohichna bylytsia: obrazni konstanty ta modyfikatsii. Aktualni pytannia humanitarnykh nauk. 2021. № 45, tom 2. S. 76-82.

Davydiuk V. Ukrainska mifolohichna lehenda. Lviv : Svit, 1992. 176 s.

Zhyrtuieva N. Fenomen liubovi u konteksti mistychnoho dosvidu. Visnyk Zhytomyrskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Franka. 2003. № 13. S. 42-46.

Kachurovskyi I. Promenysti sylvetky. Kyiv : Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia, 2008. 767 s.

Kobzar O. Mifopoetyka yak predmet i metod literaturoznavchoho doslidzhennia. Naukovi zapysky. № 15. 2010. S. 131-139.

Kryvenko A.-D. Kalendarnyi plast volynskoi demonolohii: svitohliadni ta obriadovi proiavy : dys…. d-ra filosof. Nauk : 07.00.05 / Natsionalna akademiia nauk Ukrainy, Lviv, 2017. 274 s.

Levkovych N. Zhinochi demonolohichni personazhi ukraintsiv Karpat. Narodoznavchi zoshyty. № 2 (104), 2012. S 261-267.

Liubasiuk T. Mistychne spriamuvannia dukhovnoi praktyky khrystyianskoho Serednovichchia : avtoref. dys... kand. filosof. nauk : 09.00.05 Kyiv, 2007. 17 s.

Medvedchuk O. Neomifolohichnyi dyskurs v ukrainskii literaturi kintsia ХХ -pochatku ХХІ st. (na materiali tvoriv V. Zemliaka, V. Shevchuka, H. Pahutiak, Yu. Vynnychuka, T. Prokhaska ta M. Matios). Vcheni zapysky TNU imeni V.I. Vernadskoho. 2020. № 4. S. 48-52.

Nazarevych L. Problemy chasu i chasovosti v ekzystentsializmi: literaturoznavchi aspekty. Visnyk Zhytomyrskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Franka. 2006. № 26. S. 147-150.

Parkhomenko A. Mistychne yak predmet relihiieznavchoho doslidzhennia: vid “poniattia” do “znachennia”. Nauka. Relihiia. Suspilstvo. 2011. № 4. S. 125-130.

Rudnytska A. Suchasni definitsii mistyky ta mistytsyzmu: problema spilnosti koordynat doslidzhennia. Filosofska dumka. 2018. № 4. S. 85-94.

Svystunov S. Okultyzm i novitnia mistyka v Ukraini. Faktory poshyrennia okultyzmu. Ukrainske relihiieznavstvo. 2008. № 46. S. 382-402.

Stepanov V. Antropolohichni vymiry nimetskoho mistytsyzmu: Mekhtilda Mahdeburzka ta Maister : avtoref. dys... kand. filos. nauk : 09.00.05 Dnipro, 2009. 19 s.

Stepanov V. Antropolohichni zmisty vchennia Mekhtildy Mahdeburzkoi v konteksti serednovichnoi mistychnoi tradytsii. Skhid. 2011. № 7 (114). S. 147-150.

Telizhenko L. Mistychnyi dosvid yak antropolohichnyi modus : Avtoref. dys… k. filos. nauk : 09.00.04 Kharkiv, 2004. 19 s.

Terekhova L. Filosofska spromozhnist mistytsyzmu v mezhakh serednovichnoi tradytsii. Visnyk Natsionalnoho aviatsiinoho universytetu. 2016. № 1 (23). S. 82-86.

Shabanova Yu. “Nimetska mistyka” Serednovichchia v konteksti istoryko-filosofskoi totalnosti. Visnyk kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. 2005. № 7. S. 44-48.

Shabanova Yu. Transpersonalna metafizyka nimetskoi serednovichnoi mistyky : Avtoref. dys... d-ra filosof. nauk : 09.00.05 Dnipro, 2006. 36 s.

Shalahinov B. Nimetska literatura X-XVIII storich. Vikno v svit : Zarubizhna literatura : naukovi doslidzhennia, istoriia, metodyka vykladannia / holovnyi redaktor D. Zatonskyi. Kyiv : Natsionalna akademiia nauk Ukrainy, 1999. S. 8-89.

James W. The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. Adelaide : eBooks@Adelaide, 2009. 400 p.

Scott W. On the Supernatural in Fictitious Composition; and particularly on the Works of Ernest Theodore William Hoffmann. Foreign Quarterly Review. 1827. V. 1, № 1. P. 60-98.

Lovecraft H. Notes on Writing Weird Fiction. URL: https://www.hplovecraft.com/writings/texts/essays/nwwf.aspx (дата звернення: 11.06.2023).

Stace W. Mysticism and Philosophy. Philadelphia : Lippincott, 1960. 344 p.

Wojtulewicz Ch. Late Medieval Mysticism and the Analogy of Grace and Nature. Religions. 2022, № 13. P. 1-22.

Published

2023-12-14

How to Cite

Kravchenko Ю. . (2023). Specificity of mystical discourse in humanities. World Languages and Literatures, (2), 56–75. Retrieved from https://journal.kdpu.edu.ua/wll/article/view/7702