The psychophysical problem and some reductive approaches to its solution in twentieth-century analytical philosophy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55056/apm.7727

Keywords:

philosophy of mind, consciousness, psycho-physical problem, dentity theory, eliminativism, non-reductive physicalism

Abstract

This paper discusses some of the important issues that are in the focus of contemporary analytical philosophy of consciousness. In particular, it reviews the approaches to solving the classical psychophysical problem that have been proposed within the framework of reductive physicalism. First of all, a modern reconstruction of the psychophysical problem itself is presented.

It is emphasised that a characteristic feature of analytical philosophy is the desire for clear and precise formulations of the problems under consideration. When it comes to a particular philosophical problem, it is very important to determine exactly what it is and what question within this problem needs to be solved. In order to achieve such precision and clarity, analytical philosophy uses the method of logical reconstruction of philosophical problems for their further logical and conceptual analysis. Such a reconstruction usually involves a number of theses about the area under study, each of which is sought to be reliably substantiated.

The problem arises when these theses turn out to be logically incompatible with each other and we are faced with the choice of which one to abandon. In his book The Concept of Consciousness, Ryle developed a certain approach to solving the psychophysical problem, which he called ‘logical behaviourism’. Logical behaviourism is a physicalist theory of a reductive type, since within its framework any concept belonging to the sphere of consciousness is exhaustively explained solely with the help of concepts from the sphere of physics, i.e. a complete reduction of mental phenomena to physical phenomena is made. This approach faces significant difficulties, since the restriction of the admissible physical language to behavioural predicates significantly narrows the possibilities of physical analysis of the language of psychology. Therefore, starting in the second half of the twentieth century, the so-called ‘identity theory’ began to gain more and more popularity among the supporters of reductive physicalism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Yaroslav Shramko, Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University

References

1. Baker L. R. Saving Belief: A Critique of Physicalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987.

2. Beckermann A. Analytische Einführung in die Philosophie des Geistes. Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2008.

3. Bieri P. Generelle Einleitung. In: Bieri P. (ed.). Analytische Philosophie des Geistes. Königstein: Hain, 1982.

4. Bickle J. Multiple Realizability. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 Edition). Zalta E. N. (ed.). Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/multiple-realizability/

5. Carnap R. Psychologie in physikalischer Sprache. Erkenntnis. 1932. Vol. 3. P. 107–142.

6. Chalmers D. J. Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 1995. Vol. 2. P. 200–219.

7. Churchland P. Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes. The Journal of Philosophy. 1981. Vol. 78. No. 2. P. 67–90.

8. Davidson D. Mental Events; The Material Mind; Psychology as Part of Philosophy. In: Davidson D. Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.

9. Feigl H. The “Mental” and the “Physical”. In: Feigl H., Scriven M., Maxwell G. (eds.). Concepts, Theories, and the Mind-Body Problem. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1958.

10. Jaworski W. Philosophy of Mind: A Comprehensive Introduction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.

11. Kripke S. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.

12. Place U. T. Is Consciousness a Brain Process? British Journal of Psychology. 1956. Vol. 47. P. 44–50.

13. Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia to Descartes, May 6–16, 1643. In: Descartes: Philosophical Writings. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe and P. T. Geach. London: Nelson, 1969.

14. Ryle G. The Concept of Mind. London; New York: Routledge, 2009.

15. Schütte M. Behaviorism, Logical. In: Binder M. D., Hirokawa N., Windhorst U. (eds.). Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, 2008.

16. Smart J. J. C. Sensations and Brain Processes. The Philosophical Review. 1959. Vol. 68. No. 2. P. 141–156.

17. Tanney J. Rethinking Ryle: A Critical Discussion of The Concept of Mind. In: Ryle G. The Concept of Mind. London; New York: Routledge, 2009.

18. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Vol. II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.

Published

26.12.2024

Issue

Section

HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY AND MODERNITY

How to Cite

Shramko, Y. (2024). The psychophysical problem and some reductive approaches to its solution in twentieth-century analytical philosophy. Actual Problems of Mind, 25, 9-31. https://doi.org/10.55056/apm.7727

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>