Directions and issues of analytic metaethics

Authors

  • Yaroslav Shramko Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31812/apd.v0i22.4443

Keywords:

metaethics, normative ethics, applied ethics, moral realism, moral naturalism, moral anti-realism

Abstract

A meta-theoretical approach is characteristic for analytic philosophy. By such an approach one focuses on a process of scientific investigation and on its methodological and philosophical foundations, rather than on considering object domain as such. At the same time analytic philosophy does not a exclude a theoretical study of philosophical entities, as well as possible applied aspects of such a study. More specifically, in ethics one should differentiate between (1) consideration of particular human actions and modes of behavior from the point of view of their moral evaluation; (2) ethic systems as such, which determine the conditions of such an evaluation; (3) philosophicomethodological analysis of these systems. Consequently, analytic moral philosophy comprises three levels of moral consideration, which correspond to three main parts of ethics (ethical disciplines): applied ethics, normative ethics and metaethics. An analogous division one usually finds in the methodology of science when one differentiates between some knowledge (with a theoretical and empirical levels) and its methodology. The main task of metaethics consists in elucidating the nature of moral judgments and ethical conceptions, and in finding their foundations. Such a foundation cam be given by considering a variety of issues which connect ethics with the other philosophical disciplines, such as metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of language, and philosophy of mind. Normative ethics provides concrete moral conceptions which justify certain ethical principles, as well as describe the moral reality subject to these principles. Applied ethics considers concrete moral situations, actions, behavioral practices, and provides certain recommendations for dealing with them in the positive and negative ways.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Abstract views: 314 / PDF downloads: 323

Author Biography

Yaroslav Shramko, Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University

References

Anscombe E. Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy. Vol. 53. 1958.

Austin J. L. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1962.

Ayer A. Language, Truth and Logic. New York : Dover Publications, 1952.

Black M. The gap between “is” and “should”. The Philosophical Review. Vol. 73. 1964.

Blackstone W. Are metaethical theories normatively neutral? Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1961. Vol. 39.

Boyd R. How to be a moral realist / ed. V. Sayre-McCord. Essays on Moral Realism. Cornell University Press, 1988. P. 187-228.

Brink D. Externalist moral realism. Southern Journal of Philosophy. 1986. Vol. 24 (Supplement). P. 23-40.

Brink O. Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1989.

Brock S., Mares E. Realism and Anti-Realism. McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2010.

Carnap R. Philosophy and Logical Syntax. London : Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co, 1935.

Chrisman M. What is This Thing Called Metaethics? London, New York : Routledge, 2017.

Dreier J. Is there a supervenience problem for robust moral realism? Philosophical Studies. 2019. Vol. 176. P. 1391-1408.

Garner R. Beyond Morality (Ethics And Action). Temple University Press, 1993.

Geach P. Assertion. Philosophical Review. 1965. Vol. 74. P. 449-465.

Geach P. The Virtues. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1977.

Foot P. Natural Goodness. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2001.

Jackson F. From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1998.

Hare R. M. The Language of Morals. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1952.

Horn J. On moral objections to moral realism. The Journal of Value Inquiry. 2020. Vol. 54. P. 345-354.

Hume D. A Treatise of Human Nature. Vol. 1. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 2007.

Hursthouse R. On Virtue Ethics. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1999.

Korsgaard C. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1996.

Kuusela O. Key Terms in Ethics. London, New York : Continuum International Publishing Group, 2011.

MacIntyre A. Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. London : Duckworth, 1999.

Mackie J. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Penguin Books, 1977.

Marks J. Ethics without Morals. In Defense of Amorality. New York, London : Routledge, 2013.

Miller A. An Introduction to Contemporary Metaethics. Polity Press, 2003.

Milo R. Contractarian constructivism. The Journal of Philosophy. 1995. Vol. 92.

Moore G. E. Principia Ethica.

Nolan D., Restall G., West C. Moral fictionalism versus the rest. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 2005. Vol. 83, No 3. P. 307-330.

Ogden C. K., Richards I. A. The Meaning of Meaning. New York : A Harvest Book (Harcourt, Brace & World), 1923.

Paul W. Taylor The normative function of metaethics. The Philosophical Review. 1958. Vol. 67.

Rapp C. Aristotle and neo-Aristotelian naturalism. Aristotelian Naturalism. A Research Companion. Springer, 2020. P. 35-56.

Rawls J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, 1971.

Rawls J. Kantian constructivism in moral theory. The Journal of Philosophy. 1980. Vol. 77. P. 515-572

Ronzoni M. Constructivism and practical reason: on intersubjectivity, abstraction, and judgment. Journal of Moral Philosophy. 2010. Vol. 7. P. 78.

Roojen M. van. Moral cognitivism vs. Non-cognitivism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition) / ed. Edward N. Zalta.

URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/moralcognitivism/

Russell B. Is there an absolute good? Russell: the Journal of Bertrand Russell. 1986. Vol. 6.

Russell B. The Problems of Philosophy. New York, Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1997.

Sandler R. Character and Environment. A Virtue-Oriented Approach to Environmental Ethics. New York : Columbia University Press, 2007.

Scanlon T. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, 1998.

Sidgwick H. The Methods of Ethics, 7th edition. London : Macmillan, 1967. P. 338-342.

Smith M. Realism. A Companion to Ethics / ed. P. Singer. Blackwell Publishing, 2010.

Stevenson C. Ethics and Language. New Haven : Yale University Press, 1944.

Stratton-Lake P. Ethical intuitionism. The Routledge Companion to Ethics. London, New York : Routledge, 2010.

Sturgeon N. Moral explanations. Morality, Reason, and Truth / eds. D. Copp, D. Zimmerman. Totowa, NJ : Rowman and Allanheld.

The Naturalistic Fallacy / ed. N. Sinclair. Cambridge University Press, 2019.

Zangwill N. Quietism. Midwest Studies in Philosophy. 1992. Vol. 17.

Published

2021-11-21

How to Cite

Shramko, Y. (2021). Directions and issues of analytic metaethics. Actual Problems of Mind. Philosophy Journal, (22), 9–42. https://doi.org/10.31812/apd.v0i22.4443

Issue

Section

HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY AND MODERNITY