The main directions of analytical political philosophy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31812/apd.v0i21.4370

Abstract

Modern political philosophy of analytical direction demonstrates the existence of a wide range of trends, conceptual approaches and specific theories that address a variety of issues in the political life of society. All these problems ultimately come down to the problem of the public good — what it is and how it is possible (if at all possible) to achieve. The public good should be understood here very broadly, not as a set of some specific material or spiritual goods, but as what Aristotle called the "good life", for which people, in fact, unite in society and which provides a higher degree of individual and social perfection (first of all, moral). Given that the achievement of the public good is possible only if society is based on the idea of justice, one of the central tasks of political philosophy is the theoretical explication of this idea — to explain what it should be and how society and the state can and must meet it. This idea is fundamental to other social values, the most important of which found expression in the famous slogan of the French Revolution: "Freedom, equality, brotherhood!". Depending on the value accepted as decisive for solving the problem of justice, we can distinguish four main directions of modern analytical political philosophy: utilitarianism (utility), liberalism (freedom), egalitarianism (equality), communitarianism (comunity). According to utilitarianism, the basis of justice, as well as any other concepts of moral and political philosophy, is the principle of usefulness. Socio-political conceptions of the liberal type accept freedom as the main political value. Theories of egalitarianism differ from each other depending on the concept of equality they adopt. According to the communitarian conception, the center of political and philosophical consideration in general and the concept of social justice in particular should deal not with particular individuals, but with communities and society in general.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Abstract views: 375 / PDF downloads: 301

References

Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics / R. Crisp (ed./trans.). — Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2000.

Aristotle. Politics / E. Barker, R. Stalley (trans./rev.). — Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1995.

Berlin I. Two concepts of liberty / I. Berlin Liberty. — London : Oxford University Press, 2002. — P. 166-217.

Campbell C. Persons, Identity, and Political Theory. A Defense of Rawlsian Political Identity. — Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York : Springer, 2014.

Dworkin R. In defense of equality // Social Philosophy and Policy. — 1983. — Vol. 1/1.

Gaus G. Justificatory Liberalism: An Essay on Epistemology and Political Theory. — New York : Oxford University Press, 1996.

Knowles D. Political Philosophy. — London : Routledge, 2001.

Kymlicka W. Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. — Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2002.

Larmore C. What is political philosophy? // Journal of Moral Philosophy. — 2013. — Vol. 10.

Lovett F. Rawls’s A Theory of Justice: a Reader’s Guide. — London, New York : Continuum International Publishing Group, 2011.

Muirhead R. Communitarianism // The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Edited by Hugh LaFollette. — Vol. 2. — Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.

Maclntyre A. After Virtue. — Notre Dame, Indiana : University of Notre Dame Press, 1981.

Mill J.S. Utilitarianism // Collected works of John Stuart Mill. — Vol. X. — University of Toronto Press, 1969.

Moore G.E. Principia Ethica. — New York : Prometheus Books, 1988.

Nozik R. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. — New York : Basic Books, 1974.

Pojman L. Theories of equality: a critical analysis // Behavior and Philosophy. — 1995. — Vol. 23.

Rawls J. A Theory of Justice. — Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, 1971.

Sandel M. Justice. What’s the Right Thing to Do? — New York : Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2009.

Sandel M. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. — Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1982.

Taylor C. Hegel and Modern Society. — Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1979.

Walzer M. Spheres of Justice. — New York : BasicBooks, 1983.

Published

2020-12-27

How to Cite

Shramko, Y. (2020). The main directions of analytical political philosophy. Actual Problems of Mind, (21), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.31812/apd.v0i21.4370

Issue

Section

HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY AND MODERNITY