Narratіve theory of hіstorіcal knowledge: hіstorіcal dіscіplіne on the path to methodologіcal cosmopolіtanіsm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31812/apm27.hrkwz848Keywords:
philosophy of history, narrative, methodological cosmopolitanism, theory, pluralism.Abstract
Abstract. The article is devoted to the consideration of narrative theory of historical knowledge as a set of separate concepts of narrative philosophy of history of the second half of the 20th century – early 21st century. The author briefly draws attention to the debate between early narrativists and their critics, and also examines their arguments, which laid the methodological foundation for the further development of narrative philosophy of history within the analytical philosophical tradition. Due to the fact that individual narrative concepts of historical knowledge often competed with each other, they actively engaged the conceptual and methodological tools of other philosophical schools and approaches. With time, this led to the formation of a unique feature of narrative philosophy of history — methodological openness, which in turn lays the foundations for the methodological cosmopolitanism of historical science as a broad complex of knowledge.
The author formulates and analyzes such characteristics of narrative theory of historical knowledge as methodological openness, openness to criticism, narrative tolerance, perspectivism, and instrumentalist understanding of historical narrative. It is emphasized that these conceptual foundations allow narrative theory of historical knowledge to be considered an independent comprehensive approach in the philosophy of the humanities. It should be noted that due to its internal diversity and methodological openness, narrative theory of historical knowledge, represented by a synthesis of various philosophical concepts and approaches, plays an important role in contemporary philosophy of history and claims the status of a cosmopolitan methodological system. By extensively drawing on the principles and methods of research of both analytical philosophy and other philosophical schools (pragmatism, phenomenology, internal realism), as well as literary theory, the narrative approach in the theory of historical knowledge generates significant conceptual potential and provides methodological tools for studying the historical past.
Downloads
References
References
Ankersmit F.R. Narrative Logic. A Semantic Analysis of the Historian’s Language. Den Haag: Nijhoff, 1983.
Danto A.C. Narration and Knowledge. New-York : Columbia University Press, 2007.
Danto A.C. Narrative Sentences. History and Theory. 1962. Vol. 2. № 2. — P. 146-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2504460
Domanska E. A Conversation with Hayden White. Rethinking History. The Journal of Theory and Practice. 2008. Vol. 12. № 1. — P. 3-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642520701838744
Domanska E. Istoriia ta suchasna humanitarystyka: doslidzhennia z teorii znannia pro mynule. Kyiv : Nika-Tsentr, 2012.
Drey W.H. On the Nature and Role of Narrative in Historiography. History and Theory. 1971. Vol. 10. № 2. — P. 153-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2504290
Goldstein L. Historical Knowing. Austin & London: University of Texas Press, 1976.
Mandelbaum M. A Note on History as Narrative. History and Theory. 1967. Vol. 6. № 3. — P. 413-419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2504424
Mink O.L. Narrative Form as a Cognitive Instrument. // The Writing History: Literary Form and Historical Understanding, edited by Robert H. Canary and Henry Kozicki. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1978. — P. 129-149.
Lorenz Ch. Historical Knowledge and Historical Reality: A Plea for “Internal Realism”. History and Theory. 1994. Vol. 33. №3. — P. 297-327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2505476
Roth P.A. Essentially Narrative Explanations. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 2017. No 62. — С. 42–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.03.008
Roth P.A. The Pasts. History and Theory. 2012. Vol. 51. № 3. — P. 313-339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2012.00630.x
Topolskyi Ye. Yak my pyshemo ta rozumiiemo istoriiu. Taiemnytsi istorychnoi naratsii. Kyiv : K.I.S., 2012.
Tozzi V. Dewey, Mead, John Ford, and Writing of History: Pragmatist Contributions to Narrativism. European Journal of Pragmatist and American Philosophy. 2016. Vol. VIII. № 2. — P. 167-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.641
Tozzi V. A Pragmatist View on Two Accounts of the Nature of our “Connection”with the Past: Hayden White and David Carr Thirty Years Later. Rethinking History. 2018. Vol. 22. № 1. — P. 65-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2017.1423010
White H. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore & London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975.
White H. The Burden of History. History and Theory. 1996. Vol. 5. № 2. — P. 111-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2504510
White H. The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Baltimore&London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987.
White H. The Historical Event // White H. The Practical Past. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 2014. — P. 41-62.
Zelenak E. Two Version of a Constructivist View of Historical Work. History and Theory. 2015. № 54. — P. 209-225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.10754
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Олена Мішалова

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.