ЕКОЛОГО-АГРОНОМІЧНІ СКЛАДОВІ ЕКСПОРТНОГО ПОТЕНЦІАЛУ ТЕПЛИЧНОГО КОМПЛЕКСУ РЕСПУБЛІКИ БІЛОРУСЬ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31812/eco-bulletin-krd.v5i0.4356Keywords:
зимние теплицы; овощи; экспортный потенциал; эколого-агрономические компоненты; техническая оснащенностьAbstract
Актуальность наших исследований обусловлено необходимостью поиска резервов для увеличения экспортного потенциала тепличного комплекса Республики Беларусь. Целью работы было проведение анализа экспортного потенциала и технической оснащенности тепличного овощеводства Республики Беларусь и выявление резервов для повышения эффективности функционирования отрасли.
Тепличное овощеводство Республики Беларусь, как отрасль, характеризуется стабильностью производства и динамичным развитием. В настоящее время тепличный комплекс этой страны включает 21 крупнотоварное предприятие, которые производят на общей площади 250,5 га более 94 % тепличной продукции. В среднем за 2016-2018 гг. ими произведено около 135 тыс. тон такой продукции (при средней урожайности 46,92 кг /м2). Значимая ее часть поступает на внешний рынок. Мы полагаем, что основой развития тепличного комплекса республики Беларусь должно стать изыскание возможностей наращивания экспортного потенциала. При этом реальный путь повышения эффективности отрасли – это использование инновационных эколого-агрономических технологических решений.
Downloads
Metrics
References
2. Capuno, O. B., Gonzaga, Z. C., Loreto, M. B., Gerona, R. G., Borines, L. M., Tulin, A. B., Lusanta, D. C., Dimabuyu, H. B., Vega, M. L.P., Mangmang, J. S., & Rogers, G. S. (2015). Development of a cost-effective protected vegetable cropping system in the Philippines. Acta Horticulturae, 1107, 221–228. https://doi.org 10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1107.30
3. Ciaccia, C., Ceglie, F. G., Burgio, G., Madˇzaric, S., Testani, E., Muzzi, E., Mimiola, G., & Tittarelli, F. (2019). Impact of agroecological practices on greenhouse vegetable production: comparison among organic production systems. Agronomy, 9 (7), 372. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9070372
4. de Molina, G., & Guzm.an Casado, G. I. (2017). Agroecology and Ecological Intensification. A Discussion from a Metabolic Point of View Manuel. Sustainability, 9 (1), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010086
5. DeLonge, M., & Basche, A. (2017). Leveraging agroecology for solutions in food, energy, and water. Elementa Science of the Anthropocene, 5, 6. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.211
6. Doktrina natsionalnoy prodovolstvennoy bezopasnosti Belarusi do 2030 goda [The doctrine of national food security of Belarus until 2030]. (2017). Postanovlenie Soveta Ministrov Respubliki Belarus ot 15 dekabrya 2017 g., N 962 [Resolution of the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Belarus, dated December 15, 2017, .962]. Natsionalnyiy reestr pravovyih aktov Respubliki Belarus [National Register of Legal Acts of the Republic of Belarus], 5/44566. (in Russian).
7. Fernandez, J. A., Orsini, F., Baeza, E., Oztekin, G. B., Munoz, P., Contreras, J., & Montero, J. I. (2018). Current trends in protected cultivation in Mediterranean climates. European Journal of Ho rticultural Science, 83 (5), 294–305. https://doi.org/10.17660/eJHS.2018/83.5.3
8. Hodge, C. F., Rogers, M., Handeen, D., & Schweser, G. (2019). Yield of leafy greens and microclimate in deep winter greenhouse production in Minnesota. Sustainability, 11 (28), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010028
9. Hu, W., Zhang, Y., Huang, B., & Teng, Y. (2017). Soil environmental quality in greenhouse vegetable production systems in eastern China: Current status and management strategies. Chemosphere, 170, 183–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.12.047
10. Kozlovskaya, I.P. (2012). Ekonomicheskie i ekologicheskie aspektyi teplichnogo ovoschevodstva. Otsenka proizvodstvennyih tehnologiy [Economic and ecological aspects of greenhouse vegetable growing. Evaluation of the production technologies]. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing. (in Russian).
11. Kozlovskaya, I.P. (2012). Povyishenie effektivnosti proizvodstvennyih tehnologiy v teplichnom proizvodstve [Improving the efficiency of production technologies in greenhouse production]. Nauchnoe obespechenie agropromyishlennogo proizvodstva, Materialyi Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, Chast 2 [Scientific support of agro-industrial production, Proceedings of the International scientific-practical conference, Part 2], 53–55. Kursk State Agricultural Academy. (in Russian).
12. Kozlovskaya, I.P., & Kurochkin, V. A. (2016). Energosberezhenie za schet teploizolyatsii pochvyi v zimnih teplitsah pri bessubstratnom vyiraschivanii ogurtsa [Energy saving due to thermal insulation of the soil in winter greenhouses for substrateless cultivation of a cucumber]. Intellektualnyie tehnologii i tehnika v APK, Materialyi Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Intelligent technologies and equipment in agro-industrial complex, Proceedings of the International scientific-practical conference], 379–384. Michurinsk State Agrarian University. (in Russian).
13. Kozlovskaya, I.P., & Kurochkin V. A. (2017). Bioklimaticheskiy potentsial regiona kak faktor ekonomii energoresursov v teplichnom ovoschevodstve [Bioclimatic potential of the region as a factor of energy saving in greenhouse vegetable growing]. Tehnicheskoe obespechenie innovatsionnyih tehnologiy v selskom hozyaystve, materialyi Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Technical support of innovative technologies in agriculture, Proceeding of the International scientific-practical conference], 311–313. Belarusian State Agrarian Technical University. (in Russian).
14. Martinez-Andujar, C., Ruiz-Lozano, J. M., Dodd, I. C., Albacete, A., & Perez-Alfocea, F. (2017). Hormonal and nutritional features in contrasting rootstock-mediated tomato growth under lowphosphorus nutrition. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 533. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00533
15. Munoz, P., Flores, J. S., Anton, A., & Montero, J. I. (2017). Combination of greenhouse and open-field crop fertigation can increase sustainability of horticultural crops in the Mediterranean region. European Journal of Horticultural Science, 1170, 627–634. https://doi.org/10.17660/ ActaHortic.2017.1170.78
16. O Gosudarstvennoy programme razvitiya agrarnogo biznesa v Respublike Belarus na 2016–2020 godyi [About the State program of development of agrarian business in the Republic of Belarus for 2016–2020]. (2016). Postanovlenie Soveta Ministrov Respubliki Belarus, 11 marta 2016 g., .196 [Resolution of the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Belarus, March 11, 2016,. 196]. Natsionalnyiy reestr pravovyih aktov Respubliki Belarus [National Register of Legal Acts of the Republic of Belarus], 5/41842. (in Russian).
17. Skinner, C., Gattinger, A., Krauss, M., Krause, H. M., Mayer, J., van der Heijden, M. G. A., & M.ader, P. (2019). The impact of long-term organic farming on soil-derived greenhouse gas emissions. Scientific Reports, 9, 1702. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-38207-w
18. Tao, L., Yu-Qi, Z., Yi, Z., Rui-Feng, C., & Qi-Chang, Y. (2016). Light Distribution in Chinese solar greenhouse and its effect on plant growth. International Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology, 3 (2), 99–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.22059/ijhst.2017.61273
19. Tittarelli, F. (2020). Organic greenhouse production: towards an agroecological approach in the framework of the new European Regulation, a Review. Agronomy, 10 (1), 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10010072
20. Tittarelli, F., B°ath, B., Ceglie, F. G., Garc.ıa, M. C., M.oller, K., Reents, H. J., V.edie, H., & Voogt, W. (2017). Soil fertility management in organic green house: An analysis of the European context. Acta Horticulturae, 1164, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1164.15
21. Tuzel, Y., & Oztekin, G. B. (2016). Recent developments in protected cultivation of Turkey. Acta Horticulturae, 1142, 435–442. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1142.66