Logic in educational literature of the XVII and XIX centuries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31812/apm.7681Keywords:
logic, traditional logic, history of logic, logic textbooks, Antoine Arnauld, Christoph SigwartAbstract
The «Port Royal Logic» is one of the most famous works not only in the field of logic but also in philosophy. Written under the influence of Jansenism and Cartesianism in the 17th century, it became one of the first works that departed from the classical exposition of logic. It's difficult to say the same about another work that came from the pen of the German philosopher and logician Sigwart — «Logic». What could these works have in common? In this article, I briefly analyze these two works based on certain criteria and address the question posed above. Thus, we will pay attention not only to the structures of the works and their main ideas but also to the authors' personalities and the peculiarities of the environments in which these works could have emerged.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Logical terminology: the problem of codification / A. Baumeister et al. (in Ukrainian). Filosofska dumka. 2016. № 3. С. 6–29.
Khomenko I. From the History of Teaching Logic at St. Vladimir University (in Ukrainian). Philosophy of Education. 2023. 28(2), C. 89–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2022-28-2-4
Arnauld A., Nicole P. Logic or the Art of Thinking. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166768
Bosanquet I. Logic by Christoph Sigwart and Helen Dendy. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1895. Vol. 4, №. 15. P. 388–92.
Buroker J. V. The Port-Royal Semantics of Terms. Netherlands : Synthese, 1993. 96(3). P. 455–475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064012
Finocchiaro M. The Port-Royal Logic’s Theory of Argument. Netherlands : Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997. 11(4). P. 393–410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007756105432
Grey J. The modal equivalence rules of the Port-Royal Logic. History and Philosophy of Logic. 2017. 38. P. 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2017.1318256
Maruˇsi´c J. Propositions and judgments in Locke and Arnauld: A monstrous and unholy union. Journal of the History of Philosophy. 2014. 52(2). P. 255–280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2014.0029
Nelson A., Buroker J. Port Royal Logic. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2022.
Neto J. R. M. Interpreting Arnould by Elmar J. Kremer. International Journal of the Classical Tradition. 2000. 7(1). P. 139–142.
Pearce L. K. Arnauld’s verbal distinction between ideas and perceptions. History and Philosophy of Logic. 2016. 37(4). P. 375–390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2016.1177440
Sigwart C. Logic. New York : Macmillan, 1895.
Varga P. A. The Impersonalien Controversy in Early Phenomenology. Sigwart and the School of Brentano. Austria : Brentano Studien, 2016. 14. P. 227–278.
Watson A. R. The Port-Royal Logic in the twentieth century. Journal of the History of Philosophy. 1967. 5(1) P. 55–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2008.1281
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Vitaliia Myroniak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
