On the problem of the historical basis of informal logic (historical-logical research)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31812/apm.7744Keywords:
formal logic, informal logic, history of informal logic, conceptual preconditions, pedagogical preconditionsAbstract
Informal logic emerged in the late 1970s as an attempt to create a logic that analyses and evaluates the kinds of reasoning people encounter daily. This includes reasoning in political and social discussions, media, advertising, and everyday interpersonal communication. During the early stages of developing informal logic, scholars viewed it as an alternative to formal logic. In the 1990s, this view was clarified: these two logics are not alternatives but complement each other.
The paper examines the history of the formation of the informal movement. It aims to identify the historical preconditions that led to the emergence of informal logic. In this regard, the author studies the historical period from the 1950s to the 1990s.
The paper identifies two types of preconditions: conceptual and pedagogical. Drawing on the works of Steven Toulmin and Chaim Perelman from the late 1950s, the author highlights the criticism of formal (symbolic, mathematical) logic as a key conceptual precondition. The criticism is that formal logic does not have the tools for analysing reasoning used in real-life situations. From this premise follows the proposal to give logic an empirical character - to develop practical tools for analysing and evaluating real arguments. Another conceptual precondition is to involve informal fallacies in logical consideration, which was convincingly argued in Charles Hamblin’s famous work «Fallacies» (1970).
In the paper, the author studies the history of university logic teaching from the 1950s to the 1970s. Summarising, the author states that the dissatisfaction expressed by teachers and students regarding the courses on symbolic logic, along with the appearance of new logic courses and textbooks, played a crucial role in the emergence of the informal initiative.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Barry V.E. Practical Logic. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976.
Beardsley M.C. Practical Logic. New York : Prentice-Hall, 1950.
Beardsley M.C. Thinking Straight: Principles of Reasoning for Readers & Writers. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, New York : Prentice-Hall, 1975.
Blair J.A. Pioneering Informal Logic and Argumentation Studies. / Puppo F. (eds). Informal Logic. A ‘Canadian’ Approach to Argument. Windsor : Windsor Studies in Argumentation, 2019.
Blair J.A., Johnson R.H. From the Editors. Informal Logic. 1984. Vol. 6(1).
Blair J.A., Johnson R.H. Informal Logic: The first international symposium. Irvine, CA : Edgepress, 1980.
Calendar UW. The general calendar of University of Windsor, 1971- 1972.
Capaldi N. The Art of Deception: An Introduction to Critical Thinking. Buffalo : Prometheus Books, 1973.
Copi I.M. Introduction to Logic. New York : Macmillan, 1953.
Engel S.M. With Good Reason: An Introduction to Informal Fallacies. New York : St. Martin’s Press, 1976.
Ehninger D. Influence, Belief, and Argument: An Introduction to Responsible Persuasion. Scott Foresman & Co., 1974.
Engel S.M. With Good Reason: An Introduction to Informal Fallacies. New York : St. Martin’s Press.1976.
Fogelin R.J. Understanding Arguments: An Introduction to Informal Logic. New York : Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1978.
Geach P.T. Reason and Argument. Berkeley : University of California Press, 1976.
Govier T.A Practical Study of Argument. Belmont, CA : Wadsworth, 1985.
Hitchcock D. Critical Thinking: A guide to evaluating information. Agincourt, ON : Methuen Publications, 1983.
Hamblin S.L. Fallacies. London : Methuen, 1970.
Johnson R.H. Informal Logic and Politics / E.M. Barth & E.C.W. Krabbe (еds). Logical and Political Culture. Amsterdam : North Holland, 1992.
Johnson R.H. Informal Logic and Pragma-Dialectics. Some Differences / Eemeren F.H. van, Grootendorst R., Blair J. A. & Willard C. A. (eds). Analysis and Evaluation. Proceedings of Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation. Amsterdam : Sic Sat, 1995, P. 237-245.
Johnson R.H. Making sense of informal logic. Informal logic. 2006. Vol. 26(3). P. 231-238.
Johnson R.H. The Recent Development of Informal Logic / Blair J.A., Johnson R.H., (eds) Informal Logic. The First International Symposium. Inverness : Edgepress, 1994. P. 3–28.
Johnson R.H. The Relation between Formal and Informal Logic. Argumentation. 1999. Vol. 13. P. 265–274.
Johnson R.H. The Rise of Informal Logic. Newport News : Wale Press, 1996.
Johnson R.H., Blair J.A. From the Editors. Informal Logic. 1978. Vol. 1(1).
Johnson R.H., Blair J.A. Informal logic. An Overview. Informal Logic. 2000. Vol. 20(2). P. 93-107.
Johnson R.H., Blair J.A. Logical Self-Defense. Toronto : McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 1977.
Kahane H. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric. The Use of Reasoning in Everyday Life. Belmont : Wadsworth, 1971.
Konishi T. Toward a History of Argumentation: Canadian informal logic. In: J. Ritola (Ed.), Argument Cultures: Proceedings of OSSA 09. Windsor, ON : OSSA, 2009.
Khomenko I. Empirykalizatsiya v suchasniy teoriyi argumentatsiyi: istorychni peredumovy ta napryamy doslidzhen. Aktualni problemy dukhovnosti. 2022. Vol. 23. S. 217–232.
Michalos A.C. Improving Your Reasoning. Englewood Cliffs : Prentice Hall, 1970.
Perelman C. Olbrechts-Tyteca L. Trait´e De L’argumentation: La Nouvelle Rh´etorique. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France La Nouvelle Rhetorique, 1958.
Puppo F. (eds). Informal Logic: A ’Canadian’ Approach to Argument. Windsor : Windsor Studies in Argumentation, 2019.
Scriven M. Reasoning. New York : McGraw Hill, 1976.
Toulmin S.E. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge : Cambridge UP, 1958.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ірина Хоменко
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
