What is a model and what is the use of it for a philosopher (a case study on the ideal society models)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31812/apd.v0i19.2081Keywords:
model, modeling, interpretation, social philosophy, ideal societyAbstract
Modeling is presented not only as a scientific, but also as a general philosophical method. From the author’s point of view the history of philosophy is a history of creating models which perform the functions of visibility, simplification, ordering, explanation. In this way models enable understanding, provide some interpretation, make possible predictions and show certain ways of action. The model can serve as an interpretation and confirmation of a certain philosophical concept. The author shows that the features of philosophical models are minimality of the selected criteria, simplicity and universality.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Abdula A. Razum, ratcionalnost, subekt // Aktualni problemy dukhovnosti: zb. naukovikh pratc / Red.: Ya.V. Shramko. — Krivyi Rih : KDPU, 2016. — Vyp. 17. — C. 193-210.
Aristotel. Polityka / [per. z davnohr. O. Kysliuka]. — Kyiv : Osnovy, 2000.
Blazhennyi Avgustin Tvoreniia (tom tretii). O grade bozhiem. — Sankt-Peterburg, Kiev : UTcIMM-Press, 1988.
Briukhovetskyi M.M. Intelektualna pratsia yak fenomen suspilnoho vyrobnytstva ta yii sotsialni naslidky // Aktualni problemy dukhovnosti: zb. nauk. prats / Red.: Ya.V. Shramko. — Kryvyi Rih, 2015. — Vyp. 16. — S. 149-164.
Valitskyi A. Marksyzm i strybok u tsarstvo svobody: Istoriia komunistychnoi utopii. — Kyiv: Vsesvit, 1999.
Vartofskii M. Modeli. Reprezentatcia i nauchnoe ponimanie. — Moskva : Progress, 1988.
Hobbs T. Leviafan. — Kyiv : Dukh i Litera, 2000.
Kant I. Otvet na vopros: chto takoe prosveshchenie? // Sobr.soch. v 8 tt. — Moskva : Choro, 1994. — T. 8. — S. 29-37.
Kant I. K vechnomu miru // Sochineniia v shesti tomakh. — Moskva : Mysl, 1966. — T. 6. — S. 257-347.
Lao Tczi. Dao-De-Tczin [Elektronnii resurs]. — Rezhim dostupu: http://ua.philosophy-of-religion.org.ua/tao_te_ching.html
Marks K. Manifest kommunisticheskoi partii // Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniia. — Moskva : Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo politicheskoi literatury, 1955. — T. 4. — S. 419-459.
Mor T., Kampanella T. Utopiia. Misto Sontsia. — Kyiv : Dnipro, 1988.
Panafidina O.P. Zbirni poniattia u sotsialnii i politychnii filosofii: problema interpretatsii // Aktualni problemy dukhovnosti: zb. nauk. prats / Red.: Ya.V. Shramko. — Kryvyi Rih, 2017. — Vyp. 18. — S. 148-164.
Platon. Derzhava / [per. z davnohr. ta komentari D. Koval]. — Kyiv : Osnovy, 2000.
Popper K. Vidkryte suspilstvo ta yoho vorohy. V 2-h t. — Kyiv : Osnovy, 1994. — T. I. U poloni Platonovykh chariv.
Popper K. Vidkryte suspilstvo ta yoho vorohy. V 2-h t. — Kyiv : Osnovy, 1994. — T. II. Spalakh prorotstva: Hehel, Marks ta poslidovnyky.
Sepetyi D. Vidkryte suspilstvo: etyka ta ratsionalnist. — Kyiv : Smoloskyp, 2007.
Frolov I.T. Gnoseologicheskie problemy modelirovaniia biologicheskikh sistem // Voprosy filosofii — 1961. — No 2. — S. 39-42.
Shan Ian. Kniga pravitelia oblasti Shan / L.S. Perelomova [per. s kit. ]. — Moskva : RIPOL klassik, 2017.
Shtof V.A. Modelirovanie i filosofiia. — Moskva, Leningrad : Nauka, 1966.
Hamming R.W. The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics // The American Mathematical Monthly Volume 87 Number 2 February 1980 [Elektronnii resurs]. — Rezhim dostupu: http://www.dartmouth.edu/ matc/MathDrama/reading/Hamming.html
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Nadiia Kozachenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
