Analytic normative ethics and its development trends


  • Yaroslav Shramko Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University



teleology, deontology, consequentialism, virtue ethics, ethics of duty


The paper presents an overview of the main conceptions and approaches in the field of normative ethics, developed within modern analytical philosophy. Two main types of normative ethical theories are considered — teleological and deontological ones, which differ in defining the concept of right and the concept of good and interpreting relationship between them. Theories of the teleological type (consequentialism and virtue ethics) are characterized by putting good as the primary category of ethics, which is defined independently of other ethical concepts, in particular, what can be considered right and wrong. The category of morally right, on the contrary, is defined in these theories through the concept of good, namely, as something that increases (maximizes) good or contributes to its realization. Thus, the teleological (in a broad sense) approach to ethics assumes the derivation of moral norms, in particular those that determine right behavior, from the concept of good, which acts as some basic (ultimate) goal, the achievement of which is seeking by any moral person. This ultimate and unconditional good does not depend on any moral norms and can be defined in different ways. Based on how the concept of good is concretized, various teleological concepts of normative ethics are possible. In particular, we can distinguish between egoism, altruism and utilitarianism. Both egoism and altruism have their followers among analytical philosophers, but the most widespread is utilitarianism. In theories of the deontological type (ethics of duty), the relationship between the main ethical concepts actually changes to the opposite, namely: the category of moral right is considered as the main and primary one. Accordingly, the good in such theories appears to be a subordinate concept and is ultimately defined through moral norms that enshrine and codify what is considered morally right.



Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...
Abstract views: 219 / PDF downloads: 134

Author Biography

Yaroslav Shramko, Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University


Anscombe E. Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy 53, 1958. DOI:

Audi R. The Good in the Right: A Theory of Intuition and Intrinsic Value. Princeton University Press, 2004. DOI:

Bentham J. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1907.

Boatright J., Smith J. Ethics and the Conduct of Business. Pearson, 2017.

Bradley B. Contemporary сonsequentialist theories of virtue. The Oxford Handbook of Virtue. Oxford University Press, 2018. DOI:

Cureton A., Hill T.E.Jr. Kant on virtue: seeking the ideal in human conditions. The Oxford Handbook of Virtue. Oxford University Press, 2018. DOI:

Dancy J. An ethics of prima facie duties. A Companion to Ethics. Blackwell Publishing, 2011.

Denis L. Kant’s conception of virtue. The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 2006. DOI:

Driver J. Ethics: The Fundamentals. Wiley-Blackwell, 2006.

Foot P. Natural Goodness. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 2001. DOI:

Frankena W. Ethics, Englewood Cliffs. New York : Prentice Hall, 1963.

Fried C. Right and Wrong. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978. DOI:

Gaus G. What is deontology? Part two: reasons to act. The Journal of Value Inquiry 35, 2001. DOI:

Hursthouse R. On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Johnson R., Cureton A. Kant’s moral philosophy. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2021 Edition) / Edward N. Zalta (ed.). URL:

Larmore Ch. The Morals of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. DOI:

MacIntyre A. Virtue ethics. Encyclopedia of Ethics / L.C. Becker and Charlotte B. Becker. 2nd ed. New York and London: Routledge, 2001.

MacIntyre A. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame, Indiana : University of Notre Dame Press. Thrid edition, 2007.

Mill J.S. Utilitarianism, London : Parker, Son & Bourn. West Strand, 1863.

Morality and Rational Self-Interest / ed. David P.Gauthier. Englewood Cliffs, New York : Prentice-Hall, 1970.

Nagel T. The Possibility of Altruism. Princeton. New York : Princeton University Press, 1978.

Phillips D. Rossian Ethics. W.D.Ross and Contemporary Moral Theory. Oxford University Press, 2019. DOI:

Rashdall H. The Theory of Good and Evil: A Treatise on Moral Philosophy. V. 1 and 2. Oxford : Elibron Classics, 2004.

Rawls J. A Theory of Justice (revised edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. DOI:

Ross W.D. Foundations of Ethics: the Gifford Lectures Delivered at the University of Aberdeen, 1935-6. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1939.

Ross W.D. The Right and the Good (1930) / ed. Philip Stratton-Lake. New York : Oxford University Press, 2002. DOI:

Russell D. Practical Intelligence and the Virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. DOI:

Sidgwick H. The Methods of Ethics. London : Macmillan, 1874.

Slote M. Morals from Motives. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001. DOI:

Swanton C. Virtue Ethics: A Pluralistic View. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. DOI:

Zagzebski L. Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996. DOI:

Zagrebski L. Exemplarist virtue theory. Metaphilosophy. 41. 2010. DOI:



How to Cite

Shramko Я. (2022). Analytic normative ethics and its development trends. Actual Problems of Mind, (23), 9–31.